Does anyone know anything about PythonMagick? I've got a project that could use ImageMagick, so I went looking around for PythonMagick, and I'm a bit lost. I was able to download the PythonMagick source from the ImageMagick site, but I'm on Windows and don't have the ability to compile it. I found reference to a windows installer for PythonMagick on the wxPython wiki, but the links take me to procoders.net, which seems to have abandoned the project (at least I couldn't find anything to download).

Install Pythonmagick Windows. Terry Reedy: Feb 18, 2015 06:50 pm. I cannot seem to find any instructions on how to install PythonMagick on a Mac. I've tried the instructions given on this. Installing PythonMagick with boost on osx. I am trying to install PythonMagick. I am using Python 2.7 and running Windows 7.

So what's the state of this project? Actually, I'm wondering if I would gain anything by using PythonMagick anyway. I'm going to be distributing a py2exe created executable that needs to do some image manipulation. Would I still need ImageMagick seperately installed on the client machine to use PythonMagick anyway?

Or could it all be self contained? If I'd need to install ImageMagick on client machines anyway, I guess I can just use the commandline interface to ImageMagick from Python. Adam Endicott wrote: Does anyone know anything about PythonMagick? I've got a project that could use ImageMagick, so I went looking around for PythonMagick, and I'm a bit lost. I was able to download the PythonMagick source from the ImageMagick site, but I'm on Windows and don't have the ability to compile it. I found reference to a windows installer for PythonMagick on the wxPython wiki, but the links take me to procoders.net, which seems to have abandoned the project (at least I couldn't find anything to download).

So what's the state of this project? Actually, I'm wondering if I would gain anything by using PythonMagick anyway. I'm going to be distributing a py2exe created executable that needs to do some image manipulation. Would I still need ImageMagick seperately installed on the client machine to use PythonMagick anyway? Or could it all be self contained? If I'd need to install ImageMagick on client machines anyway, I guess I can just use the commandline interface to ImageMagick from Python. Ebook harry potter bahasa indonesia lengkap contoh pdf. Why is PIL *(Python Image Library) not suitable to do the graphics?

Adam Endicott wrote: Does anyone know anything about PythonMagick? I've got a project that could use ImageMagick, so I went looking around for PythonMagick, and I'm a bit lost. I was able to download the PythonMagick source from the ImageMagick site, but I'm on Windows and don't have the ability to compile it. I found reference to a windows installer for PythonMagick on the wxPython wiki, but the links take me to procoders.net, which seems to have abandoned the project (at least I couldn't find anything to download).

So what's the state of this project? Actually, I'm wondering if I would gain anything by using PythonMagick anyway.

I'm going to be distributing a py2exe created executable that needs to do some image manipulation. Would I still need ImageMagick seperately installed on the client machine to use PythonMagick anyway? Or could it all be self contained? If I'd need to install ImageMagick on client machines anyway, I guess I can just use the commandline interface to ImageMagick from Python. There is a boost-less interface to imagemagick on the pylab project page at Sourceforge. Last I checked it compiled for windows. But, I haven't really played with it for a while.

You might find the old binaries there useful for at least some version of Image Magick. -Travis Oliphant. Adam Endicott wrote: Claudio Grondi wrote: Why is PIL *(Python Image Library) not suitable to do the graphics? Claudio I am using PIL for some other things, but what I need ImageMagick for is to convert a PDF into a series of jpegs (one per page). Its the only tool I've found to do this at a good enough resolution.

What about GraphicsMagick. The package seems to be not very easy to use even if a COM ActiveX object is available for Windows and there is an executable with command line interface, but the documentation is poor.